Mercutios Effect on Romeo and Juliet essays

Mercutio's Effect on Romeo and Juliet essays In the book Romeo and Juliet by William Shakespeare, Romeos friend Mercutio has a large effect on both Romeo and Juliets lives. Mercutios actions cause the death of Juliets cousin Tybalt. He indirectly causes Romeo and Juliet to meet, and he has an indirect cause in both Romeo and Juliets deaths. In the book Mercutios first effect on Romeo and Juliets lives was the fact that he caused them to meet. Romeo had been feeling down about the fact that the woman he loved, Rosaline, did not return his affection. While he, Mercutio and others were walking the streets, a servant from the Capulets house approached them and asked Romeo if he could read the guest list to a Capulet ball aloud to him. After he had heard that there was going to be a ball at the Capulets house Mercutio suggested that he, Romeo, and their other friends should go to the ball. Mercutio told Romeo that if he went to the ball it might take his mind off of Rosaline. Romeo decided to go to the ball and while he was there his attention was diverted from Rosaline, he met Juliet and they fell in love. If Mercutio had not insisted to Romeo that he should go to the ball, Romeo and Juliet might never have met and fallen in love. Another way Mercutio affected Romeo and Juliets lives was his death. Mercutio was killed while having a playful duel with Tybalt. This angered Romeo so much that he challenged Tybault to a duel. Romeo ended up killing Tybault. This effected Romeo and Juliets lives in a major way. For killing Tybalt, Romeo was banished from Verona. Since he was banished from Verona he could not see Juliet as often as he wished. Juliet and Romeos friend Friar Lawrence concocted a plan to get Juliet out of town and with Romeo. But for the plan to work Juliet had to pretend she was dead. After the plan was in affect Romeo heard that Juliet had died. (He had not gotten Juliets letter telling h ...

Moral Attitudes and Values Development in School

Moral Attitudes and Values Development in School Hashtag: #FailingTheHonest Moral Attitudes and Values Development in School Most parents typically taught their children not to lie and be honest in everything they do as our society in general favors those who are truthful, sincere, and equitable. Similarly, educational institutions play a major role in ensuring that each student recognizes the worth and value of being honest in purpose, work, and principle. However, despite social norm and value learned in school, honestly in some society received punishment rather than admiration or respect. The reason why schools typically avoid false systems of merits and demerits is the fact that such practice teaches children to work for end results rather study and learn. However, telling the truth in this world is not always the best policy particularly when it involves admitting your fault or exposing somebody in power. One reason is the fact that our perception of things offends those that are note aligned with them. Some people find it difficult to confront the truth as such complex reality demands emotional and intellectual integrity. Many college students according to one study consider freedom, honesty, happiness, and competence as important personal values but they do not consider honestly as an obligation. These college students may be aware that such attitude sometimes frustrates other people. The study shows that some people actually gave up their honest behavior because of a bad experience. Punishing people for being honest makes them avoid such situation again through lies and deceit. You may also like these articles: The Value of Academic Debate The Scientific Basis for Defining Seasons Remembering Our First Stage of Education Junk Food in School Practice What You Preach The Effect of Dysfunctional Social Norms Honesty builds trust and should be treated with respect but in many circumstances, a person’s honesty seems more of a disadvantage than a helpful characteristic. One problem is that traditional belief on the value of honesty is now overshadowed by alternative social norms that tolerate dishonesty. According to study, some society rationalized dishonesty and other dysfunctional norms as unavoidable and even condone fraudulent and inefficient decisions made by social leaders and public authorities. In fact, this type of attitude prevails regardless of economic costs and serious consequences such as violations of public interests. In business organizations according to research, an establishment of a norm of dishonesty among employees often make honest employees accept the norm and start viewing themselves as people who can also engage in theft and fraud. The organizations responses over this dysfunctional employee norm such as investing in high-tech security and surveillance systems seem to worsen the problem more. For instance, as costly security measures send the message that the company does not trust its employees, the sense of organization community is decreased. Moreover, it can also lead to employee hostility and retaliation as security system facilitates the belief that management is an enemy. In school, students who regularly cheat and get away them makes cheating an acceptable behavior to their peers. In time, such academic dishonesty will become a dysfunctional but well-accepted social norm among students. Moreover, since people internalized norms and cheating does not stop after graduation, these students will likely continue doing other forms of dishonesty in later life such as cheating their spouse, lying to their workplace superiors, cheat customers, theft, fraud, and others. The saddest thing about it is the fact that habitual dishonesty often makes people view their misconduct as morally acceptable regardless of company financial losses and severe social consequences.